Should I get a mammogram? Hear from personal stories…

breast cancer

How often do you get a mammogram? Why do you get a mammogram? Do you enjoy what is done to your body? And more importantly, would the males in your life agree to having their penis/testicles slammed and crushed with 20 kilograms at a time – on each testicle? Why not?

 a male-mammogram

So, what is a mammogram?

It’s a modern day torture device used without question in detecting breast tissue cancer. Or it is supposed to. Breast tissue is squashed flat between two metal/screen pads while images are taken. Unnecessary trauma – it is not uncommon for women to report torn tissue – being squashed while the woman is repositioned and pushed while entrapped.


You receive 1000 times as much radiation as you would from one chest xray. And we all know xrays are dangerous as it is.

Dr Samuel Epstein, one of the world’s top cancer experts, has stated:

“The premenopausal breast is highly sensitive to radiation, each 1 rad exposure increasing breast cancer risk by about 1 percent, with a cumulative 10 percent increased risk for each breast over a decade’s screening.”

But how effective are they? 

Up to 6 percent of women who have a mammogram – that is 6 in 100 or 3 out of 50 – will be given a false positive. This can have varied results – from unnecessary stress to unnecessary treatment. Including mastectomy, radiotherapy (more radiation) to chemotherapy. All because of a mistake.

0 mammomiss1

In a 2009 Cochrane Database Systematic Review of breast cancer screening and mammography, the authors wrote:

“Screening led to 30 percent overdiagnosis and overtreatment, or an absolute risk increase of 0.5 percent. This means that for every 2000 women screened for 10 years, one will have her life prolonged, and 10 healthy women who would not have been diagnosed if they had not been screened, will be treated unnecessarily.”

2011 BMJ findings about the damage being done by breast cancer screening, Sayer Ji of Green Med Info wrote:

“What is perhaps most disturbing about these findings is that, while they clearly call into question the safety and effectiveness of breast screenings, the studies upon which they are based use an outdated radiation risk model, which minimizes by a factor of 4 to 5 the carcinogenicity … What this indicates, therefore, is that breast screenings are not just ‘causing more harm than good,’ but are planting seeds of radiation-induced cancer within the breasts of millions of women.”

At nursing school, we were taught that most women will die WITH their breast cancers, not BECAUSE of them. What does that mean? Breast tissue, like cellulite, something else I often speak about, is comprised of fatty tissue that is known to attract and store toxins. Our body naturally encapsulates the offending toxins – this forms a cyst/tumour. And it is usually blocked off from circulation – including blood and lymph. Therefore it cannot spread. I have seen large tumours – the size of a golf ball, protruding from the tissue. It is not malignant and the woman has had the tumour for decades. Yes, it can be surgically removed but this type of trauma can in turn release the acidic mass that then affects surrounding tissue, resulting in metastases – see Annals of Oncology Journal


As awful as these tumours are, they are benign –

and if treated correctly would never have grown to this stage.

But wouldn’t doctors advise against them if they are so dangerous?

The short answer there is, many do! But they will ask you not to quote them or identify them. The sad truth is that they will be investigated and deregistered if found out to speak out against the monster that not controls modern medicine – pharma. And honest doctor is a wonderful friend to have. And becoming more rare with each passing year. Many no longer practice. Others have faced legal ramifications – others still have died untimely deaths.

Via J Miller – “Years ago at Baylor Hospital Dallas Texas, while waiting for an appointment to have a mammogram done, a doctor who was walking down the hall ask me why I was there (he was looking for some one). When I told him, he took me to a lab sort of room and showed me synthetic breasts on a board used for palpation training. Four of them and showed me how to palpate them and find cancer. Just amazing and easy. He told me never to get a mammogram again because they cause cancer. I left and never got another one. That was over twenty years ago….so they have known for a long time.”

The fact is, doctors are speaking out. Ex radiographers are speaking out – See more here

Via B Love – I got an ultrasound in place of a mammogram. I simply said to my dr “I don’t want my breast smashed can I have an ultrasound instead?” (Found a lump – benign) She said ok. Now this lady is Middle East Indian and also “prescribed” me yoga 6 days a week.. I wouldn’t call her integrative / she told my mom to take a cholesterol pill. Mom declined and 3 months later proved cholesterol could be lowered with diet and (normal pace) walking alone. But she is open to other ideas and modalities and says herself that private yoga instruction saved her daughter’s scoliosis. I simply decline all shots no one says anything to me. But my daughter goes to different dr – kaiser (actually there’s been a few switches but none of it matters of your kid is healthy, safe and sane. It’s like OK who is our urgent care she needs stitches this time – those of us who don’t vaccinate we don’t rush our kids around to ER or UC looking for [yet abother] antibiotic or ALMIGHTY MD opinion, we just don’t do we…

But doesn’t mammography protect you?

There is proof it could actually be one of the leading triggers for breast cancer. Between the trauma and radiation, anyone with a trace of common sense could see it’s a recipe for disaster and could cause exactly what you are being conned into thinking you are preventing. See the facts here

0 breasts

So what are the alternatives?

Aside from the obvious, self detection, our governments should be funding thermography instead of systematically having clinics shut down.

Meanwhile, around the world, we see Mammography banned while it is being pushed in the US, UK and Australia.

See more on my article re thermography here

Via T Martino – A few years ago they found a “cluster”. Put me through the breast biopsy from hell, sucked out 1/2 of my right boob then claimed to the biopsy results dissolved and did not give me any result. I just had a Breast Thermography scan. It is more sensitive and can pick up cancer sooner in time than mammograms. It may not be covered by insurance. I paid $180 for the initial and will have a second one in a few months, then yearly. It’s worth the $ to me, peace of mind, no radiation, and no idiots saying something is wrong when nothing is wrong. The nutjobs who screwed up the biopsy wanted me to have mammos every 3 months. I have never had another one and never plan to.

Via D William – I would just stay away from doctors, period. Check yourself and give yourself a good massage at the same time and that will circulate the toxins out of your breast tissue. Breast cancer happens because that is the fatty place in a woman’s body and that is where the body puts all the “medicine” and other toxins that it can’t process properly. Over time the body may try to wall the toxins off and you get a lump, its misdiagnosed as malignant by incompetent idiots in white coats who proceed to feed the cancers growth with their devastating “treatments” which usually will result in them surgically mutilating you or killing you with their poisons.

Where else can I get honest facts?

It’s true, while there is a plethora of advice available, paid groups like Snopes and Quackwatch – along with media and even your trusted doctor will plant just enough doubt for you to question even the most in-your-face honest truth. People exist just to bring the truth to you, if you want to truly know.

See more here

Wouldn’t there be a LOT more information available if mammograms were not okay?

The truth is, there IS a lot of information! You wont see it if you ask your doctor though.

Via J Strope – “Radiation is not the only dangerous thing about mammograms either. The destruction of the breast tissue also contributes to the formation of tumors.” Thankyou also to J Strope for the following links –

Is your bra capable of causing cancer?

Pink washing – is it complete?

So what can be done if I do have cancer?

There is so much that can be done. You just need to be pointed in the right direction. Ask why millions of former cancer sufferers are now walking free of cancer while doctors dismiss them as anecdotal, or deny they had cancer in the first place, or fight to have natural substances banned or restricted? Surely, if a doctor truly cared about your health he/she would find ANY answer, so long as it worked?

See answers on how to prevent this acidosis (the real cause of cancer) here

* If you place an order for any pure and healthy products through iHerb be sure to check the referral code of LSH273 can be seen at checkout to receive a further $10 off your total, on top of the heavily discounted prices.



Author: Chrysalis

Sharing the truth in health care with the public - especially those in nations where it is illegal to know the truth, for those who cannot afford health care, and for those who, through chronic illness or terminal disease are desperate to know the truth. And I will use any means necessary to do so. This has cost me dearly over the years - legally, professionally, financially and personally - but each time I feel as though it's not work it, I find I HAVE to keep going. After the recent loss of our adored son in law through medical negligence, I vowed to never give up the fight that I began in orthodox medicine, then as a naturopath seeing proof that there are answers outside of medicine, outside of surgery, toxic chemicals and big pharma's control - and when my daughter almost died through medical error. It's easy for some sectors of the community to dismiss someone who walked away from orthodox medicine. It's also easy for them to dismiss anyone who has qualifications in alternative medicine, regardless of how many lives they have saved - and regardless of whether most of those lives were failed by orthodoxy. Yet spend years in between, working in medical/pharma research and really get the inside story and then watch the worms come out of the woodwork. It's an interesting conundrum to see just how people who on the surface appear to be intellectual and reasonable, all of a sudden shoot off the Richter scale of common sense - after all, there is no way on earth someone who has a sound knowledge of facts, could possibly, actually know something they don't. Regardless of how my peers see me, I will spend the rest of my life getting the truth out there. It's astounding how much free time some of these poor excuses of humanity have, and how they believe they are discovering some amazing new thing with their hard hitting 'journalism' - imagine if all that effort could actually go into something decent and worthwhile.

3 thoughts on “Should I get a mammogram? Hear from personal stories…”

    1. Thanks Sue. After so many years it’s so good to see that people are waking up, even if it’s still not technically the popular thing to do according to the media.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s